Dam across creek

Discussion in 'Fly Fishing Forum' started by KerryS, Jul 20, 2013.

  1. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Messages:
    7,456
    Likes Received:
    2,821
    Location:
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    It was on private property and in an area that people tend to protect their property with guns. I choose not to break the law by trespassing and take a chance on a confrontation. So, I reported it to the agencies that I believe are responsible for enforcement of such matters. My post here was not complaining it was questioning the board if they knew of any additional agencies I could report it. You really should do something to improve reading comprehension skills.
     
  2. bennysbuddy

    bennysbuddy the sultan of swing

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2010
    Messages:
    3,841
    Likes Received:
    1,851
    Location:
    m-ville
    I sure hope they can get around to investigating the blockage
     
  3. FinLuver

    FinLuver Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,004
    Likes Received:
    313
    Location:
    Oregon
    If the creek was small enough to create a rock dam and is used for spawning; I would venture to guess that the fish wait it out, in the larger stream connected to it, for the first major rain before ascending and spawning.

    If nothing else, it may have added some cooler positive water for the youngins (no, not kids) that hang there, till flushing out to sea.
     
  4. cuponoodle breakfast

    cuponoodle breakfast la flama blanca

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2003
    Messages:
    1,842
    Likes Received:
    499
    Location:
    western WA
    Maybe Kerry can PM you the location so you can run up to Skagit County and start wrecking shit on private property.
     
  5. Smalma

    Smalma Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,254
    Likes Received:
    1,383
    Location:
    Marysville, Washington
    Kerry -
    Well done!

    I would also think about contacting the local tribs. Maybe you and WW could contact the Upper Skagit and continue the development of a relationship between OS and the tribes.

    I'm with Kerry with taking the dam out himself. It is common this time of year to find such "structures" and yes they are typically build by kids though I have found groups working their dams that were decades removed from being teenagers. Those folks can be quite protective of their efforts and may not care much about the fish resource or understand the potential damage such structures might cause. Education can pay off at times and other times not so much.

    FinLuver -
    Those structures can be pretty harmful to our fish populations. While it is true that they will wash out with the fall rains there are situations where that is too late for fish migrating to their spawning grounds. An example would be bull trout. They currently are migrating to their spawning grounds and during dry falls will often begin spawning before the dams would wash out. A couple years on the South Fork Sauk I would find such structures during pre-spawning and spawning bull trout surveys. Would find adult fish holding below them. I would open a passage way (on USFS) and within a day or two the fish would make their way upstream. However over the weekend the structure would be "repaired". One year that process was repeated weekly for nearly a month and the full spawning season. That structure was blocking access to a major spawning area (that year nearly 200 adults spawned upstream of that dam).

    Depending on the site dam and the "pond" behind it can be harmful to the juvenile fish as well. The increased area of standing water can lead to increases in temperature as well as potentially increase inter-gravel flows resulting in lower downstream flows. While that is not always the case when either happens it impacts production of such critters as juvenile steelhead, coho, cutthroat and bull trout.

    Bottom line the solution to these kinds of problems include education of both those doing the work and those living in the area. In that regard a news release from the agencies on this reoccurring problems (it crops up every time we have stretch of hot weather this time of year) can be helpful. In this case if such a release were to come out a note and maybe a picture of Kerry's discovery to the local Skagit valley paper could be effective.

    Curt
     
  6. GAT

    GAT Dumbfounded

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2012
    Messages:
    7,183
    Likes Received:
    5,268
    Location:
    Willamette Valley, OR
    Kerry, the dam is indeed illegal. I'd contact these guys:

    http://www.washingtonwatertrust.org/our-board-directors


    Washington Water Trust is a neutral, nonregulatory, 501(c)(3) nonprofit dedicated to improving and protecting stream flows and water quality throughout Washington state. We use voluntary, market-based transactions and cooperative partnerships to create balanced solutions. So fish, agriculture, business and wildlife—upon which we all depend--can thrive.


    We lease and buy water from water rights holder, temporarily or permanently to leave instream, to improve and protect flows, especially during periods that are critical to the survival of imperiled salmon and steelhead. At the right time, at the right place, even just a small amount of water left instream can have an immensely positive impact.
     
  7. FinLuver

    FinLuver Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,004
    Likes Received:
    313
    Location:
    Oregon
    Curt

    Good point.

    When I posted, your thoughts had been in my mind as well; and my post was to a body of water I'm "familiar' with...the situation is indeed very "site specific".

    In dry years, that "extra" water in certain circumstances, behind the rock dam, can be a life saver....similar to fish conserving agencies putting logs in the stream beds, to create pools for rearing juvenile fish; I have seen it actually decrease the water temperature, provide cover for fish, etc...provided there is also good riparian tree coverage as well.

    BTW...The creative engineering structures, in my world, always had spill channels built in. ;-)
     
  8. 10incher

    10incher Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    Coupeville, Washington
    In the Bay Area, Ca. they're becoming aware that bows of steelhead lineage are living in the upper drainages of many badly impounded streams. So lately it's easy to get authorities to act when an unauthorized barrier is reported.

    I fished the Guadalupe creek (avatar) in San Jose. Much of the creek ran through private property. Stream access laws allow wading within the high water mark. It did seem to upset a lot of property owners as I waded through their back yards ;) Of course, this is in the Bay Area, Ca. So you never get a gun pointed at you. You just get screechy, blow hard yuppies that think their money should entitle them isolation from dirtbag fishermen. I admit to enjoying these confrontations. Educating these individuals on the laws. Invariably though they thought I was wrong and continued to screech and whine ineffectually until I finished fishing the pool and moved on. But to get back on topic...

    It was obvious that these property owners also thought they owned the stream. I reported any unauthorized retaining walls, dams, docks, bridges and decks that looked like they could even remotely impede fish passage. And they all disappeared almost immediately.

    San Jose has only recently started giving a crap about the fish. Here in the PNW, where it's a much bigger part of the general awareness and culture I think that reporting it to WDFW will get it done.

    If things seem slow to happen contact this guy: Sergeant Kim Chandler (425) 775-1311 ext.122
    He's an agent of the WDFW that headed up a project about ten years ago focused on removal of homemade dams and structures from streams. It'll matter to him I'm sure. And THAT will get it done.
     
    KerryS likes this.
  9. luv2fly2

    luv2fly2 Active Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2003
    Messages:
    1,737
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    .othello
    these new dam builders are future corps of engineers prospects. mike w
     
  10. scottr

    scottr Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    451
    Likes Received:
    107
    Location:
    Chasing trout and birds
    Navigable rivers and creeks aren't private. If you can float it then it is public between the high water marks.

    Regardless, if it has anadromous fish in it then local, state, federal, and tribal agencies will get involved when fish passage is being blocked.

    I'd report it to the local sheriff, WDFW, and NMFS.
     
    10incher likes this.
  11. KerryS

    KerryS Ignored Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2001
    Messages:
    7,456
    Likes Received:
    2,821
    Location:
    Sedro Woolley, WA, USA.
    WDFW contacted me this morning to verify the location of the dam. They are on their way to dismantle it and educate the property owners.
     
  12. Freestone

    Freestone Not to be confused with freestoneangler

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    Messages:
    3,137
    Likes Received:
    2,889
    Location:
    Central WA
    Great job, Kerry!
     
  13. Scott Salzer

    Scott Salzer previously micro brew

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 1969
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    386
    Location:
    .
    Nicely done!
     
  14. 10incher

    10incher Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    Messages:
    210
    Likes Received:
    92
    Location:
    Coupeville, Washington
    If you could "like" posts twice, I would.
     
  15. freestoneangler

    freestoneangler Not to be confused with Freestone

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2006
    Messages:
    5,897
    Likes Received:
    1,525
    Location:
    Edgewood, WA
    Give these guys a call... no one will ever hear or suspect a thing. demoteam.JPG
     
    Nathan B likes this.